How did the Cherokee respond to removal?
Most of the Cherokee, including Chief John Ross, were outraged and unwilling to move, and they reacted with opposition. They did not believe the government would take any action against them if they elected to stay.
What were the major effects of the Indian Removal Act?
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was signed into effect by President Jackson, which allowed Native Americans to settle in land within state borders in exchange for unsettled land west of the Mississippi. Many Native American tribes reacted peacefully, but many reacted violently.
What actions did the Cherokees take to avoid removal?
Cherokee attempts at resisting the removal by the United States included creating a formal Cherokee constitution, negotiating the Treat of 1819, and proceeding with legal action within the Supreme Court. These actions proved futile when Andrew Jackson was elected President and forcibly removed them for their land.
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act?
Several tribes resisted removal, causing conflicts to erupt. Some tribes were forcibly removed, causing distrust for the government. The Cherokee were forced west along the Trail of Tears years later.
What Indians resisted the Removal Act?
The Cherokee Nation, led by Principal Chief John Ross, resisted the Indian Removal Act, even in the face of assaults on its sovereign rights by the state of Georgia and violence against Cherokee people.
What was one result of the passage of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
Answer: Explanation: The Indian Removal Act of 1830 The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was one of the most controversial policies of former United States President Andrew Jackson. This statute forced the Cherokee nation to surrender to the federal government its lands and to relocate to present-day Oklahoma.
What happened after the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. The Cherokee worked together to stop this relocation, but were unsuccessful; they were eventually forcibly removed by the United States government in a march to the west that later became known as the Trail of Tears.
Why did they want the Indian Removal Act?
Since Indian tribes living there appeared to be the main obstacle to westward expansion, white settlers petitioned the federal government to remove them. Under this kind of pressure, Native American tribes—specifically the Creek, Cherokee, Chickasaw, and Choctaw—realized that they could not defeat the Americans in war.
What were some economic effects of the Indian Removal Act?
The Indian Removal Act created more land available for white planters to settle and cultivate, thus helping to create an economic boom for the South, whose economy was driven by “king cotton.” It also furthered the South’s reliance on slavery, and increased the amount of slave sales, another aspect of the Southern …
What was the purpose of the Indian Removal Act?
The purpose of the 1830 Indian Removal Act was to relocate Native American Indians, especially Southern tribes, from land east of the Mississippi by granting them land west of the Mississippi. The legislation was fiercely contested in Congress and it narrowly passed.
What were the results of the Indian Removal Act?
The Indian Removal Act resulted in the transplantation of several Native American tribes and the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress on May 28, 1830, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, who signed it into law two days later.
Who proposed the Indian Removal Act?
The Indian Removal Act became a law in 1830 and was signed by President Andrew Jackson. The law was passed because some states were greedy about getting land that belonged to the Indian tribes.
What is the definition of Indian Removal Act?
Indian Removal Act Law and Legal Definition. Indian Removal Act of 1830 is a federal law enacted to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi.